Navigating Post-Truth in Communication: Rethinking Models for Indian Students
Keywords:
Post-truth, communication models, media literacy, critical thinking, cross-cultural communicationAbstract
The post-truth era, where emotions and personal beliefs often overshadow facts, has significantly changed communication practices worldwide. In India, with its rich cultural, social, and linguistic diversity, the challenges of post-truth communication are particularly complex. This paper focuses on how Indian students perceive, understand, and share information in a time when facts and opinions frequently mix. Indian students are often taught through communication models that stress memorization over critical thinking, making them more vulnerable to misinformation and biased messages. This paper examines the limitations of these traditional models in promoting media literacy and analytical skills. It draws on cross-cultural communication theories and considers the influence of India’s diverse media environment to propose new communication models that suit the Indian context. These models emphasize engaging with different media sources, evaluating information critically, and developing the ability to identify underlying biases. The paper also looks at how these new models can help students better navigate the post-truth landscape, enabling them to distinguish between fact and opinion, truth and propaganda. In doing so, it aims to bridge the gap between traditional educational methods and the changing needs of digital communication. This study adds to the ongoing discussion on post-truth communication by offering practical strategies for educators, policymakers, and students. The proposed models aim to empower Indian students, helping them become thoughtful communicators capable of thriving in today’s information-rich yet often misleading world.
References
Ball, James. Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World. Biteback Publishing, 2017.
Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacra and Simulation. Semiotext(e), 1981.
Chomsky, Noam, and Edward S. Herman. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books, 1988.
D’Ancona, Matthew. Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. Ebury Press, 2017.
Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder, 1970.
Ghosh, Subhasree. “Media Literacy and Its Influence on Misinformation Among Indian Youth.” Journal of Media Studies, vol. 15, no. 2, 2017, pp. 45–60.
Hall, Edward T. Beyond Culture. Anchor Books, 1976.
Hofstede, Geert. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage Publications, 1980.
Katz, Elihu, and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. The Free Press, 1955.
Kumar, Akash. “The Role of Critical Thinking in Modern Education: An Indian Perspective.” Educational Perspectives Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, 2019, pp. 56–72.
Kumar, Krishna. “Learning from Conflict: Reconstructing Education in Post-Conflict Societies.” Prospects, vol. 22, no. 3, 1992, pp. 323–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333639
Lasswell, Harold D. “The Structure and Function of Communication in Society.” The Communication of Ideas, edited by Lyman Bryson, Harper & Row, 1948, pp. 37–51.
McIntyre, Lee. Post-Truth. MIT Press, 2018.
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill, 1964.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton University Press, 2010.
Potter, W. James. Media Literacy. 9th ed., SAGE Publications, 2018.
Radhakrishnan, Ramesh. “Rethinking Communication Pedagogy in Indian Higher Education.” Communication Studies Review, vol. 12, no. 3, 2015, pp. 105–18.
Ramanathan, Vidya. “Media Literacy in India: The Current Status and Future Directions.” Indian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019, pp. 113–26.
Shannon, Claude E., and Warren Weaver. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, 1949. https://doi.org/10.2307/3611062
Silverblatt, Art. Media Literacy: Keys to Interpreting Media Messages. 5th ed., Praeger, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles are the intellectual property of the authors. The Journal of Teaching and Research in English Literature does not take ownership of the copyright of any published article. Authors retain the copyright to their articles and may republish these articles as part of a book or other materials. However, while republishing an article published in JTREL, the author must ensure that the following conditions have been met:
- The source of the publication (the title, volume, number and URL of the Journal) should be acknowledged.
- The article will remain published on the JTREL website (except on the occasion of a retraction of the article) and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- We do not allow the distribution and transmission of plagiaristic works based on the articles that appear in our journal.
- Readers may not use the articles for commercial purposes unless they get the written permission of the author and publisher. To disseminate copies for commercial purposes, write to editor.JTREL@gmail.com