Sinclair and Coulthard’s ‘IRF’ Model in a One-To-One Classroom: An Analysis

Authors

  • Debaditya Biswas Freelance English (Business & General) Language Instructor

Keywords:

Sinclair and Coulthard model, one-on-one learning, Shakespeare, classroom discourse analysis

Abstract

This paper explores the application of the Sinclair and Coulthard model of discourse analysis to a one-on-one classroom setting, specifically while teaching Shakespeare's Macbeth to advanced students. The study reviews the model's theoretical foundations, its hierarchical structure, and addresses criticisms regarding its limitations, such as the inability to account for para-linguistic features and the phenomenon of double labelling. Through detailed analysis of recorded classroom interactions, the paper demonstrates the model's adaptability despite its challenges, particularly in identifying and categorizing various acts and moves within the discourse. Despite the model's shortcomings, it provides valuable insights into classroom dynamics and the intricacies of teaching complex literature. The paper concludes by advocating for further research to enhance understanding of discourse patterns in unique educational settings.

Author Biography

Debaditya Biswas, Freelance English (Business & General) Language Instructor

Debaditya Biswas is an experienced English language trainer with extensive experience in enhancing the linguistic skills of South Korean executives at top corporations. He holds advanced degrees in Applied Linguistics and Management, and is recognized for his expertise in voice modulation, business communication, and soft skills development.

References

Atkins, A. 'Sinclair and Coulthard’s ‘IRF’ model in a one-to-one classroom: an analysis'. 2001. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-artslaw/cels/essays/csdp/Atkins4.pdf.

Coulthard, M. (Ed). Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 1992.

Farooq, M. “Examining a Male Teacher’s Attention in a Mixed-sex EFL Japanese High School Classroom Based on the Sinclair-Coulthard model”. 2000. University of Birmingham, Master of Arts Dissertation. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/college-artslaw/cels/essays/matefltesldissertations/fardiss.pdf

Francis, G., & Hunston, S. (1992). “Analysing Everyday Conversation”. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 123-161.

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. "Categories of the Theory of Grammar." WORD, vol. 17, no.2, 1961, pp. 241-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1961.11659756

Nunan, D. Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1992.

Shakespeare, W. The Merchant of Venice. Edited by B A Mowat and P Werstine, Simon & Schuster, 2004.

Sinclair, John and Coulthard, M. “Towards an Analysis of Discourse”. In Coulthard, M. (Ed). Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 1992. 1-34.

Willis, Dave. “Caught in the Act: Using the Rank Scale to Address Problems of Delicacy”. In Coulthard, M. (Ed). Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 1992. 111-122.

Downloads

Published

01.04.2020

How to Cite

Biswas, D. (2020). Sinclair and Coulthard’s ‘IRF’ Model in a One-To-One Classroom: An Analysis. Journal of Teaching and Research in English Literature, 11(2), 3–12. Retrieved from https://journals.eltai.in/index.php/jtrel/article/view/JTREL110202

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2020): April

Section

Research Articles

License

Articles are the intellectual property of the authors. The Journal of Teaching and Research in English Literature does not take ownership of the copyright of any published article. Authors retain the copyright to their articles and may republish these articles as part of a book or other materials. However, while republishing an article published in JTREL, the author must ensure that the following conditions have been met:

  • The source of the publication (the title, volume, number and URL of the Journal) should be acknowledged.
  • The article will remain published on the JTREL website (except on the occasion of a retraction of the article) and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
  • We do not allow the distribution and transmission of plagiaristic works based on the articles that appear in our journal.
  • Readers may not use the articles for commercial purposes unless they get the written permission of the author and publisher. To disseminate copies for commercial purposes, write to editor.JTREL@gmail.com