Intersemiotic and Intralingual Translation in Frankenstein: The Graphic Novel

Authors

  • Bibin K Assistant Professor, Department of English (EOFL), Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research (Deemed to be University), Andhra Pradesh, India. https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5074-658X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66121/k2fpc053

Keywords:

Graphic novel, Frankenstein, Intersmiotic, Intralingual

Abstract

This paper reads Frankenstein: The Graphic Novel by Jason Cobley and Brigit Viney as an exercise in two modes of translation working simultaneously: Intersemiotic, where Shelley’s prose becomes visual sign, and intralingual, where her language is reworded for a new medium and a new audience. While Frankenstein has generated extensive scholarship on adaptation across film and visual media, the combined operation of these two translation modes within graphic novel adaptations has received comparatively little sustained attention. Three scenes serve as the ground of analysis: Victor’s confrontation with the creature, his dream following the act of creation, and the creature’s education in the De Lacey household. Read through Charles Peirce’s semiotic framework, the visual choices of the adaptation (iconic, indexical, and symbolic) do more than illustrate Shelley’s narrative; they press on its emotional and thematic pressure points in ways the prose expresses through different semiotic resources. Umberto Eco’s attention to cultural codes anchors the visual language in the interpretive expectations of contemporary readers, while Julia Kristeva’s concept of the abject serves as a supplementary lens in the nightmare sequence, where the horror of bodily dissolution is most acute. Across all three scenes, visual sign-making and verbal rewording work together to reshape Shelley’s representations of power, horror, and isolation for a new readership.

Author Biography

  • Bibin K, Assistant Professor, Department of English (EOFL), Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research (Deemed to be University), Andhra Pradesh, India.

    -

References

Abrams, M. H. Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature. Norton, 1973.

Barthes, Roland. S/Z: An Essay. Translated by Richard Miller, Hill and Wang, 1974.

Botting, Fred. Gothic. Routledge, 1996.

Chute, Hillary. Graphic Women: Life Narrative and Contemporary Comics. Columbia UP, 2010.

Cobley, J., and B. Viney. Frankenstein: The Graphic Novel. Lucent Books, 2010.

Eco, Umberto. A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana UP, 1976.

Forry, Steven Earl. Hideous Progenies: Dramatizations of Frankenstein from Mary Shelley to the Present. U of Pennsylvania P, 1990.

Groensteen, Thierry. The System of Comics. Translated by Bart Beaty and Nick Nguyen, UP of Mississippi, 2007.

Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. Routledge, 2006.

Jakobson, Roman. “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.” On Translation, edited by Reuben Arthur Brower, Harvard UP, 1959, pp. 113-118.

Kristeva, Julia. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Translated by Leon S. Roudiez, Columbia UP, 1982.

McCloud, Scott. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. HarperPerennial, 1994.

Peirce, Charles S. The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings. Edited by Justus Buchler, Dover, 1955.

Postema, Barbara. Narrative Structure in Comics: Making Sense of Fragments. RIT Press, 2013.

Shelley, M. W. Frankenstein. Fingerprint Classics, 2023.

Young, Elizabeth. “Here Comes the Bride: Wedding Gender and Race in Bride of Frankenstein.” Feminist Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, 1991, pp. 403-437.

Zanettin, Federico. Comics in Translation. Routledge, 2008.

Downloads

Published

14-08-2026

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Intersemiotic and Intralingual Translation in Frankenstein: The Graphic Novel. (2026). Journal of Teaching and Research in English Literature, 16(3), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.66121/k2fpc053