Student-led Seminars in an ESL Classroom: An Experiment

Kshema Jose

Asst. Professor, Dept. of Training and Development, EFL University, Hyderabad.

Keywords: Student-led seminars, pedagogic competence, collaborative learning, peer- teaching, critical thinking


Abstract

A large majority of students who complete postgraduate programs in English, ELT, or English literature, go on to become teachers/ trainers. Yet very few courses taught on these programs help students gather the pedagogic experience required to make a successful transition from ‘student’ to ‘teacher’ so that they become comfortable in the classroom (Atkinson, 2001) and deliver effective classes (Young and Bippus, 2008). This paper evaluates the efficacy of student-led seminars as an instructional method to help student-teachers acquire content knowledge and gain pedagogic competence. The paper reports how the ‘Training-to-train’ course delivered to semester III students on the MA program at EFLU, Hyderabad, was redesigned to introduce student-led seminars to encourage students who lacked teaching experience engage better with course contents. This paper discusses in detail the different parts of a modified version of student-led seminars that can be implemented by ESL teachers to facilitate students’ acquisition of complex concepts through experience and reflection.


References

Atkinson, Maxine P. (2001). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Reconceptualizing scholarship and transforming the academy. Social Forces, 79 (4), 1217–29.

Biggs, John B., and Collis, Kevin F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcomes). Educational Psychology Series. New York: Academic Press.

Blackie, M.A.L., Case, J.M., and Jawitz, J. (2010). Student-centeredness: The link between transforming students and transforming ourselves. Teaching in Higher Education, 15 (6), 637– 646. DOI: 10.1080/ 13562517.2010.491910. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 232613589_Student-centredness_The_link_ between_transforming_students_and_ transforming_ourselves

Bullock, S. M. (2011). Becoming a teacher. In S. M. Bullock (Ed.), Inside teacher education: Challenging prior views of teaching and learning (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091- 403-4_1

Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. M. (2015). Framing teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, Part 1. Journal of Teacher Education, 66 (1), 7–20.

Gosser, D. K., Cracolice, M. S., Kampmeir, J. A., Roth, V., Strozak, V. S., and Varma- Nelson, P. (2000). Peer-led team learning: A guidebook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall.

Hakuta, K. (2016). Rich talk = rich learning. Teaching Channel. https://learn.teachingchannel.com/blog/ 2016/07/26/rich-talk-rich-learning

Kurczek, J., Johnson, J. (2014). The Student as Teacher: Reflections on Collaborative Learning in a Senior Seminar. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education. 12 (2), 93–99.

Maurer, Suzanne B. (1999). The role of the area seminar in graduate education: Response to ‘Rethinking the Graduate Seminar.’ Teaching Sociology 27 (2), 174–79.

Ovens A., Garbett D., Hutchinson D. (2016). Becoming teacher: Exploring the transition from student to teacher. In Loughran and Hamilton (Eds.) International Handbook of Teacher Education. Singapore: Springer.

Roskos, Kathleen A., Christie, James F., and Richgels, Donald J. (2003). The essentials of early literacy instruction. Young Children, March 2003. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 242649333_The_Essentials_of_Early_Literacy_ Instruction

Sharan, Y. (2010). Cooperative learning for academic and social gains: Valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education 45, 300–313.

Worth, Nancy. (2013). Experimenting with student-led seminars. Planet. 27, 30 –35. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/ doi/pdf/10.11120/plan.2013.00003

Young, S. L., and Bippus, A. M. (2008). Assessment of Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) Training: A case study of a training program and its impact on GTAs. Communication Teacher 22 (4), 116–29.