Mapping the Contours of Language Used on Social Media
Prof. Lata Dubey
Department of English, Faculty of Arts, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi- 221005, India
Keywords: social media, linguistic analysis, Web 2.0, neologisms, online communication, cognitive orality, linguistic economy, context collapse
Abstract
This paper seeks to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the language utilized on contemporary social media platforms. The exponential growth of these platforms is closely intertwined with advancements in web technologies, particularly those heralded by the advent of Web 2.0. This evolution has facilitated a transformative impact on the English language, as observed through the widespread adoption of neologisms, abbreviations, acronyms, numeronyms, logograms, and emoticons. The study will focus on the linguistic practices evident on platforms such as Facebook, Snapchat, Flickr, YouTube, and in user generated content on review sites like TripAdvisor and Amazon. The unique nature of online language can be attributed to several key factors. Cognitive orality refers to the way online communication mimics spoken language, despite being text-based. The semiotics of compensation highlights how users employ visual and textual elements to convey meaning and emotion that might otherwise be expressed through non-verbal cues in face-to-face interactions. Linguistic economy describes the tendency towards brevity and efficiency in online communication, often resulting in the use of shorthand and symbols. The economy of attention emphasizes the competitive nature of online spaces, where users must capture and maintain the attention of their audience in an environment saturated with information. Context collapse refers to the blending of multiple social contexts into a single online space, requiring users to navigate and adapt their language to diverse audiences simultaneously.
References
Crystal, David. (2007) Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2017). ‘Whose context collapse?’: Ethical clashes in the study of language and social media in context. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2-3), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1034
Gibson, E. J. & Pick A. D. (2000) An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development. Oxford University Press.
Gibson, E. J. (2002). Perceiving the Affordances: A Portrait of Two Psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibson, J.J. (1986). The Ecological Approach To Visual Perception (1st ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203767764
Graham, Phil. (2002). Hypercapitalism: language, new media and social perceptions of value. Discourse & Society. 13(2), 227-249.
Grannan, C. (2022, August 25). What’s the Difference Between Emoji and Emoticons? Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/story/whats-the-difference-between-emoji-and-emoticons
Hern, A. (2015, 06 February). Don’t know the difference between emoji and emoticons? Let me explain. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/feb/06/difference-between-emoji-and-emoticons-explained. Accessed on 11 May 2024.
Hout, Tom. Van. (2015). Print Media Discourse. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction.1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi187
Kern, M L et.al. (2016). Gaining Insights from Social Media Language: Methodologies and Challenges. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. 21(4), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000091
Logan, Robert. K. & Mira Rawady. (2021). Understanding Social Media: Extensions of Their Users. Peter Lang Publication.
Mandiberg, M. (Ed.). (2012). The Social Media Reader. NYU Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt16gzq5m
Martínez-Arbelaiz, A., Areizaga, E., & Camps, C. (2016). An update on the study abroad experience: language choices and social media abroad. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(4), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2016.1197929
Marwick, ALICE. E. & Danah Boyd. (2010). I Tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, Context collapse, and the imagined audience; New Media and Society. 13 (1), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
McCarty, Steve. Social Media to Motivate Language Learners from Before Admission to After Graduation. 87-105
O’Reilly, T. (2012). What Is Web 2.0?: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), The Social Media Reader (pp. 32–52). NYU Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt16gzq5m.8
Page, Ruth.et.al. (2014). Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. Routledge.
Spilioti, Tereza. (2015). Social Media Discourse. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi170
Stahr, Andreas& Lian Malai Madsen. (2015). Standard language in urban rap – Social media, linguistic practice, and ethnographic context. Language & Communication. 40,67-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.01.002