Assessing Indian ESL Teachers’ Research Literacy: Perspectives from ELTAI 2023 Conference Abstract Reviewers

Dr M. S. Xavier Pradheep Singh

Assistant Professor, PG and Research Department of English, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu.

M. Joseph Vinoth

Ph.D. Research Scholar, PG and Research Department of English, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5929-0554

Keywords: Research Literacy, Abstract Review, Conference Abstract Writing


Abstract

Presenting research papers at conferences significantly contributes to the professional development of ESL teachers. However, there is a notable deficiency in research literacy among Indian ESL teachers, as evidenced by the abstracts submitted for the ELTAI Annual Conference 2023. Out of over 480 abstracts received and evaluated by 12 experts, only 52 were accepted without modifications. A total of 43 abstracts were outright rejected, 98 required resubmissions after substantial revisions, and 287 were slightly amended by reviewers. This study documents the reviewers’ perceptions regarding the research literacy of the submitters and identifies key areas for improvement in abstract writing. It reports on a survey conducted with the reviewers, focusing on their views on ESL teachers’ research literacy, common abstract errors, and the essential skills for effective abstract writing. The findings of this study are expected to inform faculty development programmes and curriculum design, highlighting the increasing necessity for practice-based research in the current academic climate.


References

Banegas, D., & Consoli, S. (2021). Initial English language teacher education: the effects of a module on teacher research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51, 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1876840

Beaudry, J. S., & Miller, L. (2016). Research literacy: A primer for understanding and using research. Guilford Publications.

BERA (British Educational Research Association). (2014). Research and the teaching profession: Building the capacity for a self-improving education system. Final report of the BERA-RSA inquiry into the role of research in teacher education. BERA-RSA. https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/BERA-RSA-Research-Teaching-Profession-FULL-REPORT-for-web.pdf

Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 731–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2006.03.012

Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 358–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp007

Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43, 391–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000170

Brown, J. D., & Coombe, C. (Eds.). (2015). The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press.

Calvert, M., & Sheen, Y. (2015). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research, 19, 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814547037

Evans, C. (2017). Early career teachers’ research literacy: what does it look like and what elements support its development in practice? Research Papers in Education, 32(4), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1324013

Evans, C., Waring, M., & Christodoulou, A. (2017). Building teachers’ research literacy: integrating practice and research. Research Papers in Education, 1522(June), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1322357

Groß Ophoff, J., Schladitz, S., Leuders, J., Leuders, T., & Wirtz, M. A. (2015). Assessing the Development of Educational Research Literacy: The Effect of Courses on Research Methods in Studies of Educational Science. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(4), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1068085

Gwee, S., & Toh-Heng, H. (2022). Transformative Learning: English Language Teachers’ Experience of Engagement in Classroom Research in Singapore. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221135456

Heikkilä, M., & Eriksen, A. (2023). Polyphonic agency as precondition for teachers’ research literacy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2224560

Irby, B. J., Tong, F., Lara-Alecio, R., Guerrero, C., Guo, W., Abdelrahman, N., & Serrano, J. (2020). Teacher perceptions of the effectiveness of a science-infused literacy intervention for English language learners. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 15, 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480x.2019.1673165

McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research Methods for English Language Teachers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315832548

Rimmer, W., & Floyd, A. (2020). The Contribution of Conferences to Teachers’ Professionalism. TESL-EJ, 24(1), 1-17.

Waring, M., & Evans, C. (2014). Understanding pedagogy: Developing a critical approach to teaching and learning. Routledge.

Williams, D., & Coles, L. (2007). Teachers’ approaches to finding and using research evidence: An information literacy perspective. Educational Research, 49(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701369719

Yusof, I. J., Latif, A. A., Derasid, N. A. C., & Jani, M. D. M. (2019). Research literacy level of education postgraduate research students using rasch measurement model. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3S2), 815–820. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.c1242.1083s219

Most read articles by the same author(s)