Assessing Indian ESL Teachers’ Research Literacy: Perspectives from ELTAI 2023 Conference Abstract Reviewers
M. S. Xavier Pradheep Singh
Assistant Professor, PG and Research Department of English, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8827-2494
M. Joseph Vinoth
Ph.D. Research Scholar, PG and Research Department of English, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5929-0554
Keywords: Research Literacy, Abstract Review, Conference Abstract Writing
Abstract
Presenting research papers at conferences significantly contributes to the professional development of ESL teachers. However, there is a notable deficiency in research literacy among Indian ESL teachers, as evidenced by the abstracts submitted for the ELTAI Annual Conference 2023. Out of over 480 abstracts received and evaluated by 12 experts, only 52 were accepted without modifications. A total of 43 abstracts were outright rejected, 98 required resubmissions after substantial revisions, and 287 were slightly amended by reviewers. This study documents the reviewers’ perceptions regarding the research literacy of the submitters and identifies key areas for improvement in abstract writing. It reports on a survey conducted with the reviewers, focusing on their views on ESL teachers’ research literacy, common abstract errors, and the essential skills for effective abstract writing. The findings of this study are expected to inform faculty development programmes and curriculum design, highlighting the increasing necessity for practice-based research in the current academic climate.
References
Banegas, D., & Consoli, S. (2021). Initial English language teacher education: the effects of a module on teacher research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51, 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1876840
Beaudry, J. S., & Miller, L. (2016). Research literacy: A primer for understanding and using research. Guilford Publications.
BERA (British Educational Research Association). (2014). Research and the teaching profession: Building the capacity for a self-improving education system. Final report of the BERA-RSA inquiry into the role of research in teacher education. BERA-RSA. https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/BERA-RSA-Research-Teaching-Profession-FULL-REPORT-for-web.pdf
Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 731–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2006.03.012
Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 358–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp007
Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43, 391–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000170
Brown, J. D., & Coombe, C. (Eds.). (2015). The Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press.
Calvert, M., & Sheen, Y. (2015). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research, 19, 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814547037
Evans, C. (2017). Early career teachers’ research literacy: what does it look like and what elements support its development in practice? Research Papers in Education, 32(4), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1324013
Evans, C., Waring, M., & Christodoulou, A. (2017). Building teachers’ research literacy: integrating practice and research. Research Papers in Education, 1522(June), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1322357
Groß Ophoff, J., Schladitz, S., Leuders, J., Leuders, T., & Wirtz, M. A. (2015). Assessing the Development of Educational Research Literacy: The Effect of Courses on Research Methods in Studies of Educational Science. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(4), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1068085
Gwee, S., & Toh-Heng, H. (2022). Transformative Learning: English Language Teachers’ Experience of Engagement in Classroom Research in Singapore. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221135456
Heikkilä, M., & Eriksen, A. (2023). Polyphonic agency as precondition for teachers’ research literacy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2224560
Irby, B. J., Tong, F., Lara-Alecio, R., Guerrero, C., Guo, W., Abdelrahman, N., & Serrano, J. (2020). Teacher perceptions of the effectiveness of a science-infused literacy intervention for English language learners. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 15, 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480x.2019.1673165
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research Methods for English Language Teachers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315832548
Rimmer, W., & Floyd, A. (2020). The Contribution of Conferences to Teachers’ Professionalism. TESL-EJ, 24(1), 1-17.
Waring, M., & Evans, C. (2014). Understanding pedagogy: Developing a critical approach to teaching and learning. Routledge.
Williams, D., & Coles, L. (2007). Teachers’ approaches to finding and using research evidence: An information literacy perspective. Educational Research, 49(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701369719
Yusof, I. J., Latif, A. A., Derasid, N. A. C., & Jani, M. D. M. (2019). Research literacy level of education postgraduate research students using rasch measurement model. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3S2), 815–820. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.c1242.1083s219