The Importance of Written Feedback and Grading in English Composition: A Comparative Study of U.S. and Nepali ESL Practices
Keywords:
ESL Composition, Written feedback, Grading practice, Process-oriented pedagogy , Culturally responsive TeachingAbstract
This paper investigates the role of written feedback and grading in English composition by comparing U.S. and Nepali ESL practices. In U.S. classrooms, feedback is process-oriented, emphasizing rhetorical awareness, revision, and formative assessment, while grading often incorporates alternatives like contract systems. Nepali ESL instruction, however, remains largely product-oriented, emphasizing grammar, structure, and examination results. Using survey data from 30 students and 10 instructors, the study reveals that Nepali learners value structural guidance, grammatical accuracy, and model essays more than idea-centered feedback, highlighting a gap between global pedagogical ideals and local learner needs. Results also show that grades are seen as strong motivators when paired with constructive commentary. The findings recommend culturally responsive adaptations, such as integrating annotated models, balancing formative and summative assessment, and gradually introducing process-oriented strategies, to enhance ESL writing instruction in Nepal.
References
Almohawes, M. (2025). Undergraduate EFL learners’ preferences for three different types of written corrective feedback. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1532729. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1532729
Banstola, P. R. (2024). An Observational Study on Peer Feedback Practices in University Level English Language Classrooms in Nepal. Janapriya Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 13(1), 41-55.
Ferris, D. R. (2014). Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 181–199). De Gruyter Mouton.
Horner, B., Lu, M. Z., Royster, J. J., & Trimbur, J. (2011). Language difference in writing: Toward a translingual approach. College English, 73(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/25790477
Inman, J., & Powell, P. (2018). In the absence of grades: Dissonance and desire in course contract grading. College Composition and Communication, 69(2), 247–272.
Keating, B. A. (2019). A good development thing: A longitudinal analysis of peer review and authority in undergraduate writing. Across the Disciplines, 16(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-J.2019.16.3.08
Li, J., Huang, J., Wu, W., & Whipple, P. B. (2024). Evaluating the role of ChatGPT in enhancing EFL writing assessments in classroom settings: A preliminary investigation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-9.
Miao, J., Chang, J., & Ma, L. (2023). Research trends of written corrective feedback in L2 writing: A bibliometric analysis. Sage Open, 13(1), 21582440221135172.
Shen, R., & Chong, S. W. (2023). Learner engagement with written corrective feedback in ESL and EFL contexts: a qualitative research synthesis using a perception-based framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 276-290.
Shahi, M. B., & Chaudhary, N. R. (2024). Exploring Feedback Mechanisms in Higher Educational Governance: Learning from a Case Study. Contemporary Research: An Interdisciplinary Academic Journal, 7(2), 174-195.
Shi, H., Chai, C. S., Zhou, S., & Aubrey, S. (2025). Comparing the effects of ChatGPT and automated writing evaluation on students’ writing and ideal L2 writing self. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-28.
Summer, N. (2011). Responding to student writing. In D. Healy (Ed.), The Norton book of composition studies (pp. 569–586). W. W. Norton & Company.
Teller, J. (2016). Are we teaching composition all wrong? The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/are-we-teaching-composition-all-wrong
Inman, J., & Powell, P. (2016). In the absence of grades: Dissonance and desire in course contract grading. Composition Forum, 34. https://compositionforum.com/issue/34/absence-of-grades.php
Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Horner, B., Lu, M. Z., & Matsuda, P. K. (Eds.). (2010). Cross-language relations in composition. Southern Illinois University Press.
Lunsford, A. A., Brody, M., Ede, L., Moss, B. J., Papper, C., & Walters, K. (2010). Grammar and writing. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586773