Prompting Metacognition: Using Prompt Writing as a Language Task and Metacognitive Tool in ELT

Jerome S; P. Sathya

doi:10.66121/s8h07k02

Authors

Jerome S Research Scholar, Holy Cross College (Autonomous), Nagercoil, affiliated to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Abishekapatti, Tirunelveli https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2907-5423
P. Sathya Assistant Professor, Department of English, Holy Cross College (Autonomous), Nagercoil, Affiliated to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Abishekapatti, Tirunelveli

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66121/s8h07k02

Keywords:

Prompt writing, Generative AI, ELT, Metacognition, Pedagogy

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools have made their way into English Language Teaching (ELT) contexts, yet their pedagogical value remains contested. While many learners engage with GenAI primarily as a quick hack for producing answers, fewer use it as a resource for reflective language learning. This study explores prompt writing as a language learning task that supports both language development and metacognitive awareness. The study was conducted with a target group of pre-seminary, tertiary-level learners with mixed linguistic proficiency. Over the course of four instructional sessions, the study used a classroom-based action research design. Learners engaged in cycles of prompt drafting, GenAI-generated responses, peer discussion, and prompt refinement. Classroom observations, learner reflections, and group discussions were used to gather qualitative insights. The findings indicate measurable improvement in learners’ autonomy, as learners became aware of how lexical choices shape meaning, along with increased engagement, teamwork, and reflective thinking. The study argues that prompt writing, when treated as a language task rather than a technical skill, can function as a practical tool for fostering metacognition in ELT classrooms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jerome S, Research Scholar, Holy Cross College (Autonomous), Nagercoil, affiliated to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Abishekapatti, Tirunelveli

-
P. Sathya, Assistant Professor, Department of English, Holy Cross College (Autonomous), Nagercoil, Affiliated to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Abishekapatti, Tirunelveli

-

References

Alghasab, M. (2025). English as a foreign language (EFL) secondary school students’ use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools for developing writing skills: Unveiling practices and perceptions. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2345678. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2345678

Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning (Report No. ED463659). ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/ERIC-ED463659

Arif, M., & Naeem, M. (2025). The impact of generative AI on learner autonomy and critical thinking in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing classrooms. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.54321/jalt.2025.07101

eLearning Industry. (2025). Artificial intelligence-powered adaptive learning: Education in 2025. https://elearningindustry.com/artificial-intelligence-powered-adaptive-learning-education-2025

Habibian, M. (2015). The impact of training metacognitive strategies on reading comprehension among ESL learners. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(28), 61–69. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1081318

Kasimova, D. (2025). Using effective prompts in artificial intelligence-assisted foreign language learning. CyberLeninka. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/using-effective-prompts-in-artificial-intelligence-assisted-foreign-language-learning

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.

Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language: An overview. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 31, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.019

Sharadgah, T. A., & Sa’di, R. A. (2022). A systematic review of research on the use of artificial intelligence in English language teaching and learning (2015–2021): What are the current effects? Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 5(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1029871

Sharifuddin, S. A., & Hashim, H. (2024). Benefits and challenges in implementing artificial intelligence in education (AIED) in ESL classrooms: A systematic review (2019–2022). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/21473

Sutrah, S., Ahmad, M. K., & Rahman, S. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence as an assisted-language learning tool: A systematic review of its efficacy in enhancing speaking skills among EFL learners. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i1.4123

Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Chen, H. (2024). A study of human–AI interaction patterns in artificial intelligence-assisted second language writing. Neliti Journal of Language Education, 9(2), 101–118. https://www.neliti.com/publications/ai-assisted-second-language-writing