A Critique on Dogme ELT
Keywords:
ELT, Methods, Dogme ELT, Critique.Abstract
This article is a qualitative research on the innovative technique brought into the domain of ELT by Scott Thornbury, Dogme in English language teaching. An attempt is made to analyze Dogme ELT in the light of postmethod conditions.
References
Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36 (1): 5-18.
Bryndal, Malgorzata. Dogme ELT. [Web Log Message]. Retrieved from http://www.developingteachers.com/articles_tchtraining/dogme1_malgorzata.htm
Christensen, Torkill. (2005). Dogme in language teaching in Japan, The Language Teacher, 29 (1): 15-18.
Hunter, Vaughan. (2004). Tremble of truth: Dogme 95, ideology and the genealogy of cinematic realism, The Film Journal. Web.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: (E) merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching, TESOL Quarterly, 28 (1): 27-48.
Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method – Why? TESOL Quarterly, 24 (2): 161-176.
Templer, Bill. (2004). Reflective teaching in the low-resource classroom: Reinventing ourselves as teachers through self-scrutiny, Humanising Language Teaching, 6 (3). Web.
Thornbury, Scott. (2009). Nothing if not critical. [Web Log Message]. Retrieved from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/dogme-nothing-if-not-critical
Wiffin, Stuart. (2014). Teaching unplugged. [Web Log Message]. Retrieved from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/teaching-unplugged
Yahoo discussion group. Retrieved from https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dogme/info
