The Long-Term Effects of Comprehension-Based Instruction

Authors

  • Ali Isik Istinye University Department of English Language and Literature, Istanbul.
  • Stephen Krashen University of Southern California (Emeritus)

Keywords:

Language acquisition, comprehension-based instruction

Abstract

We examine the progress of Turkish students who completed an intensive instruction in English to prepare them for secondary school. In secondary school, those who were in a comprehension-based class outperformed those who took a traditional class and had a clearer understanding of how language is acquired. There is also evidence that those in the comprehension-based prep class continued to improve after completing secondary school.

References

Isik, A. (2000). The role of input in second language acquisition: More comprehensible input supported by grammar instruction or more grammar instruction? ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 129-130,225-227.

Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading. Westport: Libraries Unlimited. Second edition.

Krashen, S. (2018). Improvement on TOEFL through reading and without formal instruction: Another look at Isik (2013). Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(1), 24-25.

Mason, B., & Krashen, S. (2019). Hypothesis: A class supplying rich comprehensible input is more effective and efficient than “immersion.” IBU Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 7, 83-89.

Downloads

Published

01-05-2020

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

The Long-Term Effects of Comprehension-Based Instruction. (2020). Journal of English Language Teaching, 62(3), 3-8. https://journals.eltai.in/jelt/article/view/JELT620302

Similar Articles

1-10 of 275

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.